|
|
|
|
|
by gozur88
3566 days ago
|
|
I don't agree. The whole point of the program is to get banks to lend money to students when the spreadsheet says it's a bad idea. And the schools should not be in the business of telling students what they can afford. For one thing, they probably can't know. |
|
Without the government guarantees, banks would think hard about whether a loan was repayable, and schools wouldn't have nearly as many anthropology or art history programs cranking out unemployable specialists year after year.
The government guarantee removes economic consequences for certain actors -- for the school and the bank, but NOT for the student. The student with an art history degree is now stuck with a massive loan that is not even dischargeable in bankruptcy, whereas the bank and the school suffer no consequences for having trained someone in an unemployable specialty of little to no economic value.
On the contrary, they are incentivized to do that.