| Really weak article with a sensationalist headline. Very reductionist to say Apple is "over", and the analogy to Microsoft as "unsexy" might be apt, but ironically Microsoft is having a great technological resurgence and has seen rock solid 5 year growth in their stock. Not to mention that Apple has so much cash in their coffers that they can afford to fail and figure things out for a while. Give them a damn second. There are so many interesting, high-investment bets that these tech giants are making, and I'm looking forward to seeing how they pay off. Self-driving cars, drone technology, AR, VR, ... Who cares about iPhone sales. > But without Steve Jobs, I can’t see Apple pushing the boundaries of these industries and unlocking their true potential It's unreal to me how people associate so much of Apple's success and ability to "Steve Jobs". The image of one guy rolling up his sleeves and pushing out all of the successful products and ideas alone is ridiculous. He had help. Apple is fine without him. And the notion that a company just "peaks" once and it's done is also a complete fallacy. Their trajectory can be full of peaks and dips -- in fact many people would have said years ago that Apple had already peaked, and it was on its way into the dumpster. Building an expensive HQ, comparing that to banks, what the heck does that have to do with anything ? None of these things are predictors for success or failure. Even if Apple's trajectory was directly in line with a similar company that had once existed and then failed, that means absolutely nothing to predict the future of Apple. You just can't. In my view it shows poor judgement on the author's part to even try and make a call like that, you'd have to be insane to think you had that kind of predicting power. Apple can live or die for all I care but I think it's a huge leap to say they're "over" at this point... |