|
|
|
|
|
by throwanem
3568 days ago
|
|
Little of both. We were pretty sure it would already be impossible, or nearly so, for a malicious user to probe our infrastructure this way, but when it's so simple to be even more sure, why not? Similarly, we'd already observed a low but nonzero rate of users inadvertently providing such addresses - not during signup or onboarding so much, but in recipient lists they submitted. Since we used the same recipient checking code everywhere, why not cut that back to zero, too? |
|