Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by redirectleft 3566 days ago
Err.. isn't monkeys transcribing a New York Times article even more amazing?
4 comments

Amazing maybe, but not really news. Monkeys could pilot the Mercury capsule, too. With several months of intense training, you can make them do a lot of tasks involving pattern recognition. Reliable brain-sensing, on the other hand, is news.
Ahem. They didn't pilot the capsule. They were passengers.
I don't know. I saw a pretty compelling documentary about the space capabilities of monkeys: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Chimps
Thank you for your opinion, Chuck.
Since people don't seem to get the reference: "Mercury astronauts are passengers, not pilots" was a prejudice against the budding manned space program, spread by among others Chuck Yeager. It seemed to hurt their ego that even a monkey could do it (…after months of training, which included electroshock therapy).
As someone else in the comments pointed out, they didn't transcribe it by reading it. The right letter to type was lit up on the screen. (The article mentions this, but doesn't emphasize it too well.)
... by the power of mind alone!
No.

"Look at me, I can type 100 wpm... Why would anyone ever want to do this?"

Why does the value always need to be explained? Of course the value is explained in the article, but you just read the headline?