|
|
|
|
|
by Swizec
3573 days ago
|
|
My favorite explanation has been: science answers What/How, religion answers Why. It's when we start asking one a question for the other that we get into trouble. Which is what I don't like about [some] creationism. It tries to use a Why tool to answer a How question. And as long as you take Biblical stories to be metaphors and/or best-effort explanations from before we had the data that we have now, they're perfectly fine stories that make plenty of sense as an explanation. Adam&Eve for instance. If all you know is that it takes a man and a woman to produce a baby, it stands to reason that at some point there had to have been the first pair. |
|
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-overlapping_magisteria#Rec...