|
|
|
|
|
by hackuser
3573 days ago
|
|
I agree with the general point, and I believe it's well-established, that aid can have second-order and higher order effects that are counter-productive. On the other hand, in this case it's merely FUD and an argument for inaction; we would need specific information about Moolenaar's charity. I'm not going to stand still and do nothing just in case. Second-order effects also can make donations to the Free Software Conservancy counter-productive. As an aside, I wonder if the Free Software Conservancy would want to be seen telling people not to donate to Ugandan AIDS victims and to redirect the money to themselves. My guess is they would not like to see their name here. > emotional appeal Life and death has appeal beyond 'mere' emotion. It's more important than free software, and I say that as an avid fan of, and occasional donor and contributor to FOSS projects. EDIT: A rewording or two |
|
The advice "Don't just do something, stand there!" comes to mind.
Bram has been going to Kibaale since 1994, and he's now presumably busy feeding and clothing a new generation of orphaned children, orphaned by the original orphans. Isn't this precisely the creation of a trans-generational cycle of dependency by Western patrons?
Wouldn't those people rather be in a position to feed and clothe their own population? Perhaps even be the ones sending charitable aid workers to the Netherlands.
What is happening is evidently not a path to freedom and independence. The correct action can be found in inaction.
> Life and death has appeal beyond 'mere' emotion.
Remember it's true: lives are valuable, but our dignity is valuable too.