|
|
|
|
|
|
by Lio
3573 days ago
|
|
|
I don't want to discard your opinion but it does seem like a bit of a false dichotomy when we're talking about FOSS software. No one is compelled to use Vim over Vi, you can just leave it in compatible mode or use another vi binary such as the one in busybox. As far as the built in language and external API being second-class well you may have a point but both Vim and NeoVim are improving. Whilst it's still useful and still provides, IMHO, nice ergonomics I'm probably going to stick with either Vim or NeoVim I think. I really don't mind if they never make up their mind what they want to be when they grow up. ;) |
|
|
From my perspective, I want to see Vim/NeoVim differentiating itself from the competition. It's extensible... but emacs does that better. It's simple and modal... but nvi does that better. It's stuck somewhere in the middle, and mediocrity is a terrible, terrible fate.
Ow! Stop that! Okay, this is the last time I sneak a Dresden Files quote into my HN comments. I swear. :-D.