|
|
|
|
|
by enraged_camel
3570 days ago
|
|
>>Since Tesla must understand this effect, I resent them using this a marketing term since they can exploit the misunderstanding while not being technically wrong. I resent that you're accusing Tesla of intentionally misleading the public on what the feature does. The car issues very obvious and repetitive warnings to the driver to explain the shortcomings of the technology and what the driver has to do to compensate. If the driver fails to act in accordance with the warnings, the car turns off the feature. I mean, I dunno. To me, it looks as if Tesla has already gone above and beyond to communicate accurately, and the main reason they're pushing things even further is because of the intense media scrutiny on Tesla accidents (which the incumbent manufacturers probably love). |
|
Whether or not they intend to mislead, in practice the name is misleading, and I think it is a mistake they could easily fix.
For example 'copilot': a competent, capable partner, but the ultimate responsibility still rests with the pilot.