|
|
|
|
|
by lafay
3564 days ago
|
|
> I appreciate that Mark Suster is upfront in saying he's only interested in the correct pedigree. I didn't read it in such black & white terms. More like: If your team is uniquely qualified to solve the problem you're working on, you should lead with that. At the very least, spend some time refining a story about why whatever background you have actually is the perfect pedigree for what you're working on. |
|
In an early draft of my comment I thought about emphasising that it's a showdown between two strawpeople, which leaves most of the rest of us guessing where we fit.