|
|
|
|
|
by csbubbles
3564 days ago
|
|
Nope. I can only reiterate that you've completely missed the point. It actually was that people may have different opinions, regarding their priorities in their lives as well. And it's only up to them to decide what those priorities are. Whether you like it or not. |
|
I understand that you are saying people can set whatever priorities they want in life. I agree that people are, for the most part, free to do that. That doesn't mean that some priorities are not objectively wrongly prioritized. It's not all relative.
Anyone who prioritizes business over family is objectively wrong (and we used to have laws that made that clear, which have, for the most part, been neutered in the last half-century -- a big loss IMO).
Your point is that no one can make value judgments about another person's priorities. I don't agree. People can, should, and do. You are of course factually correct that you can't be physically stopped from having the wrong priorities. That doesn't make them right. Historically, when behaviors appear that manifestly show a mis-prioritization of this type, the behavior is illegitimate and the perpetrator would be punished by the civil authority for the behavior.
Anyway, this thread is already ridiculously deep and quite off-topic. Let's stop it here and agree to disagree.