Thats a terrible example for your point because the alternative is you improve the odds of electing someone who is even more likely to bomb the middle east, and does not just support mass surveillance, but thinks we arent doing enough of it. The alternative thinks that we should be asking people to answer questions such as thwir religion to be able to enter the country.
Oh, and thinks that besides not bombing enough, the other problem is a lack of using nukes.
Oh, and thinks that besides not bombing enough, the other problem is a lack of using nukes.