|
|
|
|
|
by halayli
3581 days ago
|
|
I feel you're trying to defend go without much objectivity. Such performance gap needs to be addressed properly instead of saying it's pretty good already. It doesn't sound right if go takes 5 hours to finish csv parsing job while Python takes 2.5 hrs. |
|
If you're going to throw out specific numbers, you should probably get them, or at least the ratios, correct.
Numbers from the tracker are:
Go: avg 1.489 secs Python: avg 0.933 secs
If you'd like to test this on a really large dataset to come up with how long it would take for Python to perform the same operation when Go requires 5 hours, that might be a bit more useful. If we just look at the available data, then the _extrapolation_ for Python would not be 2.5 hours. There's still a gap, but there's no need to exaggerate.