|
|
|
|
|
by jasode
3583 days ago
|
|
>...and if you want a language without a type system don't use a language with a type system. I wasn't the one who downvoted you but I'm guessing it happened because your advice is misguided and it shows how you're confusing the ceremony of a human bashing extra keystrokes to repeat annotations everywhere with the concept of static typing that enables compiler correctness checking. The keyword "auto" enables the separation of those 2 concepts. Type inferencing and type deduction is the technology that gives you "types" without the tedious "ceremony". |
|