[lisper]

> I've read it before.

You need to read it again. Because it agrees with everything you say:

> in real QFT there's no duality to solve

> Photons aren't objects in a classical sense. Photons are event probabilities.

> "Entanglement" is a description of how the probabilities interact, not an explanation of why they interact as they do.

Yes, all true.

> if you're going to suggest it's all about "observers" and "minds"

I suggest no such thing.