|
|
|
|
|
|
by rabbitmq
5925 days ago
|
|
|
It turns out that RabbitMQ's throughput of tens of thousands of transient messages per second per CPU is enough for a lot of cases. Similar story with latency. ZeroMQ does a lot of neat stuff to make it go faster still, e.g taking out the server, and removing all routing info from the messages, but ends up being much more like an alternative to sockets as a result, which makes it less useful for general work. In summary - RabbitMQ and ZeroMQ are complementary, rather than really being alternatives to one another. alexis RabbitMQ |
|
|