[SamBam]

> Compared with markdown, drool is minimal without signals like [ or !. drool will not make a literary article look like programming codes.

looks at demo screenshot

> There is @@a link to @@./demo.webp https://www.google.com/ncr

[dou4cc]

The link content is "a link to @@./demo.webp". "@@./demo.webp" is a picture. Is drool not minimal enough?

[SamBam]

The content is exactly as I posted it above. There is an @@ before "a link".

I was just saying that this seemed exactly as arbitrary as "[", which is what drool said it was avoiding.