|
|
|
|
|
|
by happy_tentacles
3582 days ago
|
|
|
The two arguments presented - to keep a legal path for a higher priority routing - during late 2015 Trilogue Negotiations that framed the directive the way it is: Driverless cars
Medical applications (remote operations rooms were mentioned) You have to give to telecoms - they built the infrastructure and are desperate to design some services that could become additional source of revenues. For now, it seems, the door is shut - maybe with the new automation coming they could dig it up - akin to "you don't want your house to send fire warning to city grid too slow, do you?". |
|
|