[happy_tentacles]

That's a very interesting point you are making. Would seem true if one establishes that any off-the-personal-baseline analysis by a human-wetware cost more, the further off the analysed position is.

Your idea would to be to sneak in notions that are outside of a personal, or group, bubble. Do it gently and slowly. It would work if the positions would be presented with known and familiar analogies. In some setup that could work, we think in analogies.

One could argue, that that's what we do all the time - convincing ourselves and others of value of existing or new positions while ever-slightly changing our own positions. Do we want to dress that process up with machine learning, though?