Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by DominikR 3585 days ago
Actually the 1000 year number comes from Project Orion in the 1940ties and 50ties.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Orion_(nuclear_propuls...

An updated design from the 80ties calculated a time of 100 years:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Longshot

And a nuclear fusion design is calculated to achieve 12% of light speed, thereby reducing time to reach the fourth nearest sun system in 46 years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Daedalus

So there are concepts that could make unmanned interstellar travel possible, even within a humans life span, it's just that it costs so much and the incentive is pretty low compared to the incentive countries had for getting objects into space. (primarily military incentives - get spy satellites and nuclear warheads into space to not fall back behind adversaries)

I believe that given a strong enough incentive humans could do it, no matter what current consensus is telling us.

Humans set out to work on reaching outer space without even having a design on how this could be achieved and we did it anyway.

2 comments

At current rates, it would be 137 thousand years.

http://www.ucolick.org/~mountain/AAA/aaawiki/doku.php?id=how...

50ties - Fifty-ties -- Fifties - 50s / 50's
Thanks, English is not my native language. So what is correct, 50s or 50's?
Yeah, I figured, no worries. Your English is excellent, apart from this little oddity. Either way to put the 's' is fine, really, but I think with the apostrophe (50's) is more common.
Thanks a lot! Very kind of you.