Well, then, I suppose what I'm saying is: in an information-age society, it's the child exploitation/molestation that's properly a crime; capturing the same as a piece of media is no modifier.
But the media itself is illegal to posess. Some images / videos are Ok, some are not. Moral judgement is involved.
What I am saying is, if society wants to, it can totally declare that some pictures / videos are ok and some are not. This already happens all the time.
Maybe that's not really OK anymore. I tend to be of the belief that, for freedom to prevail in the information age, information freedom must be absolute.
What I am saying is, if society wants to, it can totally declare that some pictures / videos are ok and some are not. This already happens all the time.