[sneak]

Direct eyewitness/victim testimony is proof, actually.

You can doubt the credibility of that, if you like, but that's up to you; to say there is no proof is a falsehood.

It is interesting that you pay more heed to the notion of a character assassination conspiracy involving multiple credible parties than the simpler explanation that perhaps this well-known liar is also a well-known rapist.

Have you heard of Occam's Razor?