Finally, a way to assess poverty from space, ironically increasing the distance between the observers and the observed by several literal orders of magnitude.
I guess people just don't want to believe that poverty can exist in their neighborhood. They have to believe it is somewhere far away on the other side of the planet.
First world poverty is bad, but it's nothing compared to the worst of third world poverty. By any measure the poor of the first world are significantly better off than the third world. Income, life expectancy, access to luxuries like clean and running water to artificial lighting, etc.
To some extent yes. I think even without social programs they would still be better off, as there are no social programs in the third world. Wages are just vastly higher in the first world, even for the poorest. Third worlders live on a dollar a day or less. Social programs help a lot of course.