|
|
|
|
|
by internaut
3599 days ago
|
|
It's a class issue. Americans confuse a former iconography (civil rights era) with existing circumstances. Today they have a class divide, not a racial one. That many POCs are in one class and not another is misdirecting idealism. The plight of urban blacks is so well documented that it is a television trope, but the poverty that exists in the countryside and even entire cities stagnating and evidence of decay is more or less ignored e.g. Note how the Tiny House movement is an attempt for 'middle class' poor mostly to differentiate themselves from 'those people' living in trailer parks (who in turn would be appalled if they were conflated with those living in section 9). Presiding over it all is of course the spread of the gated communities. This is all an emergent class structure similar to the one that developed in Europe centuries ago. In my country, any time we hear of Southerners, the implication is immediately that they are red necks, racists, ignorant jesus freaks. We don't get that from our television or radio. We get it from your movies, television and radio. Many europeans don't realize they are inadvertently being drawn into (one side of) a culture war on a different Continent e.g. see BLM protests in London. |
|
People who say "It's a class issue" seem to miss that it's much easier to recognize race than class.
People discriminated through redlining (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redlining) would disagree that "It's a class issue":
>For example, in Atlanta in the 1980s, a Pulitzer Prize-winning series of articles by investigative-reporter Bill Dedman showed that banks would often lend to lower-income whites but not to middle- or upper-income blacks.
People who read the stats showing the differences in sentencing between black males and white males, even when controlled for income, would hardly say "It's a class issue."