|
|
|
|
|
by Chathamization
3599 days ago
|
|
A number of politicians have advocated that, particularly when it comes to non-violent drug offenses. Clinton, for example, is running on that platform: https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/criminal-justice-refor... Though I should say that I'm not sure shorter sentences across the board are what's needed. We definitely need shorter sentences for non-violent drug offenses, and shorter sentences for inmates who seem like they can be rehabilitated is a good idea. On the other hand, I infrequently read about cases in the news where some deeply disturbed individual commits a truly heinous crime, and then is back out in the general population after only 2 or 3 years. There are some people who really should be in for a longer time. I often look at sentencing through the lens of "how would I feel if this person lived in my neighborhood." Someone like Mumia Abu-Jamal is in for life, but I wouldn't be particularly bothered if he lived next door to me (or Bernie Madoff, sentenced to 150 years). Then there are people who only get a few years, but I wouldn't want them living anywhere near me. |
|
[0]http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8k4nmRZx9nc