Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kldaace 3594 days ago
Every time I see an article like this, I wonder whether these experts have put their money where their mouths are. I'm sure there are plenty of Uber investors willing to take the other side of this bet, especially if you think the company is worth less than half of its valuation. Otherwise, it makes it hard for me to believe their opinion.
4 comments

I wonder whether you saw the article last week about how difficult it is to actually short Uber.[1]

[1]: http://qz.com/707947/investors-have-placed-a-one-way-bet-on-...

This is depressingly common. I occasionally run across a company which I'm sure will have a lower stock price in a year. The numbers don't add up, the business plan is just unworkable, or it fails the "this tiny company has a higher valuation than Walmart" test.

But about nine out of ten times I can't get shares to short, or my broker can get shares from another brokerage for a large minimum lot and even larger fee. I can understand some smaller companies don't have a large float, but it seems like you should be able to get shares for companies like Uber and Tesla.

Isnt tesla one of the most shorted companies currently? Cant be too hard to short it
I'm not an expert on this stuff, but my understanding is when lots of people sell short it's harder to do the same. It doesn't really make sense to me, since I think when you short a stock those shares get sold, so they're going somewhere.
Ah thanks, I actually hadn't seen that. Maybe in the future these predictions can be handled by some sort of betting market.
There are always proposition bets but they are generally illegal in most, if not all, markets.
Ideally that would happen in the stock market, of course.
This line of thinking is wrong. You can't just short a company because you have a reasonable belief it is overvalued when the vast majority of investors think otherwise. There needs to be some event that forces the public to reevaluate their valuation of the company for the short to work.
This.

Shorting is expensive, and you could become insolvent if you short too early.

Well, yes. I used to think like this, but when I placed said bets, it turns out that the market was fully capable of remaining stupidly wrong quite a bit longer than I was able to remain solvent. It was shocking to say the least. Even when the facts were obvious - an inexplicable stubborn attachment to remaining wrong. I think there's even a famous quote along those lines - so I'm guessing that I'm not the only one with the experience of learning that you can be correct and still have bad timing.
The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.