|
|
|
|
|
|
by jlgaddis
3599 days ago
|
|
|
> The purpose was to show that it can be done better and cheaper than what IBM and the Australian Government came up with in FIVE years vs 2 students in 24ish hours. Sure, they made a nice little prototype -- or MVP, if you will. I'll certainly give them credit for that. But did they really do it "better and cheaper ... in 24ish hours" when they didn't come anywhere near meeting all of the requirements of the project (most of which probably aren't even public/published)? |
|
|