|
|
|
|
|
by kirstendirksen
5932 days ago
|
|
I enjoyed your blog. Though I'm curious about one of your final comments: "To be clear, I still want a bank-vault sized pile of money but I have accurately recognized why I want it. I don’t really care about a big house and a fancy car. I might someday; I don’t right now. My cramped apartment is sufficient. What I really want is the financial freedom to sit in a quiet room by myself and explore my ideas". Do you really think you need the money for that freedom? Don't you think if you work at what you enjoy than you can find enough money to pay for your "cramped apartment"? It doesn't sound like you're averse to working, and I'm guessing there is some work that you'd enjoy that would pay for your basic expenses. I say this because I had a similar idea as you while in college (and I also had read Rand and loved the Fountainhead). So I studied economics and thought I'd do some business thing for awhile to make enough money to be free to do whatever I wanted to do. But then as I saw the jobs that were open to me, I realized I didn't really want any of them. And then as I began to explore careers, I began to talk to more people who chose to work for money and never really got away from that (and some of these people were getting ready to retire) and I realized my plan could be dangerous. I started thinking about how short life was and decided to just go for something that interested me. So I decided to find a career where I could interview people. I tried to get a magazine internship, but couldn't find anything. Then someone told me about a television internship open at the local NBC affiliate. I applied and spent the next 7 years at that station (after working for 8 months for free, living at home and doing odd jobs on the side). Maybe I just got lucky, but I am relieved that I didn't stick with my initial plan to make tons of money and then do what I wanted. Now I love what I do and for awhile, made some good money at it. Though I've since voluntarily downshifted to live in Spain with someone I love and be at home more with my young daughters. |
|
Personal finance expert Ramit Sethi has a lot to say on this subject; he leans more towards the "earn more than you spend" approach, but he focuses on brutally cutting spending on anything that doesn't really make you happy.
One of Ramit's favorite rants is to criticize people who encourage budding savers to avoid spending money on "lattes" (in Ramit's rants, it's always lattes). The way Ramit sees it: if lattes, or expensive cars, or Fabergé eggs make you happy, there is no reason not to spend money on it--as long as you have your other vital expenses, which includes savings, taken care of first.
I think that's the biggest takeaway from the "spend less than you earn" approach: lots of people buy expensive cars or big houses because they think it's what they want, or because they assume it is what they're "supposed" to have or want, but closer examination would probably show that often, enough is enough, and more is too much.