|
|
|
|
|
by jms18
3594 days ago
|
|
> Solid is modular and extensible and it relies as much as possible on existing W3C standards and protocols. That's great! A good place to start would be here -- https://validator.w3.org/nu/?doc=https%3A%2F%2Fsolid.mit.edu.... It's a nitpick, I know. I view source. I always view source. There a lot of things that made the web a success (the REST principles underlying the architecture, the "a" tag, the non-draconian "error" handling, right-place-at-right-time), and one of them was "view source." And I always view source. And then I pick at nits. This one advertises "[relying on] existing W3C standards", so I brought it up. I usually keep my mouth shout. |
|