[pdeuchler]

Not quite sure I'd be allowed to talk about that stuff anymore, although depending on the records you guys keep my name will probably pop up in some calls/emails if you searched for it.

And look, I entirely get what you're saying, and I know you guys probably mean it, but again, you're missing the perspective of people who have a distinct impression of the financial services industry and who _know_ what happens when you go down this road with PayPal, Braintree, et. al. They don't necessarily care if you guys are making a best effort on a case by case basis if you're still hampered by contractual obligations to play by someone else's game. And when you try to make these moral stands but almost immediately point out where you were contractually obligated to compromise said stands it doesn't give people confidence in the moral stands and makes it look like grandstanding (holy run on batman). This is where the disconnect and (seeming) disingenuousness arises.

This is also why I emphasized that you guys should really just tell people to contact support first, because that clears all confusion and miscommunication without having to make moral pronouncements and before you guys are put in a position that forces you to compromise these bright lines.

Anyway, I really support what you guys are doing and don't want to seem overly critical but I wanted to communicate a disconnect that seemed to get lost in translation.

[makomk]

Funny thing is, even PayPal allow sex toys and a lot of sex toy sellers accept PayPal. Have done for quite a while if I remember correctly. I guess from their perspective it must not be that high risk