But my whole point was speculating that it's possible, not that it's proven to be true. So of course I am citing speculative sources, this is speculation... :\
Although it may sound like it, I don't believe it's splitting hairs to draw an important distinction between (a) speculation that might be observable in our lifetime, or might have relevance to stock trading, and (b) speculation that has fundamental inconsistencies with deep principles on which the entire known body of physics knowledge is based, and which would revolutionize our understanding of the universe and the nature of reality if true. Here's another way to say it: time travel is strictly less crazy than acausality.
Sorry, not trying to be a buzzkill :)