|
|
|
|
|
by adamconroy
3599 days ago
|
|
And quite possibly the whole system was replaced within a few years and it turned out that management were correct in not letting your team waste the organization's money trying to be purists, and probably over-engineering at the same time. |
|
And I offered to do the work necessary on my own time on both these occasions, with safeguards so we could fall back into the status quo at the slightest signal of trouble.
So no, while I can be - and am - passionate about new tech, I cut my teeth developing large scale systems that had to be up at all times. So being conservative at work is second nature to me, even if I play with unstable or experimental stuff all the time.
It's... not cool that you tried to be clairvoyant instead of curious.
Maybe in the future you could ask "How did that turn out though? Were the systems changed, that you know of? Did you consider that management didn't want the team to waste the org's money trying to be purists or over-engineering? Did the decision maker have a technical background?" or other such questions, in order to later make an informed statement.
On the other hand, the way you stated it made me think you've had an awesome experience with great management, so congrats on that, I hope you keep choosing amazing teams to join - if or when you change gigs :^)