[tedks]

Burnout isn't interesting to organizational psychologists because it was relatively well-understood in 90s. There's only so much you can study in this space and all the low-hanging fruit is gone. It's still a popular topic for some, but the reason you don't see the actual research is probably because you expect it to be covered in blogs. Go to a university library, get on the wifi, and download some proceedings of organizational and cognitive psychology journals.

[dredmorbius]

Or Google Scholar + Sci-Hub.

Seriously, for any research, an absolute godsend.

Thank you, Alexandra.

[dnautics]

using google scholar, I don't see any hypothesis-driven research, just clinical accounts and non-hypothesis-based psychology.

This is probably the closest.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3796712/

[infinite8s]

Hypothesis driven psychology is tough to perform because of the difficulty of controlling external factors.

[tedks]

Well, it isn't the 70's anymore, even if you had an IRB that would let you induce burnout in a randomly assigned experiment you couldn't publish it.

I don't see how the study you linked is "hypothesis-based," exactly; it's just an imaging study and thus is likely wrong because of the fMRI bug.

[dnautics]

that's why you would do a longitudinal study. Pick a cohort of individuals that are entering a high-risk-of-burnout field, and the control will be the pre-burnout individual and the experiment would be monitoring them over time. Of course this doesn't really fit funding/research promotion cycles in science.