|
|
|
|
|
by 5xman
3609 days ago
|
|
Your comment and the parent really surprise me.
Passing such moral judgements based on the diet of a species seems a bit 'youtubish'.
Using the same logic one could argue that humpback whales are the real assholes since they protect those seals and sea lions so they can prey on those tiny, little penguins which are the cutest. (Seals even rape them :'( http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20141117-why-seals-have-sex-w...) |
|
Causing harm to social intelligent species, such as by eating them, is objective. In theory another species could eat plants and also attack mammals for fun all the time. That species would also be assholes. This isn't a judgement based on 'diet', it's a judgement based on how they interact with others.
> since they protect those seals and sea lions
That's not the same logic. The same logic might lead you to call seals and sea lions assholes, but it wouldn't extend to the whales.