|
|
|
|
|
by mgummelt
3607 days ago
|
|
It doesn't matter whether the cost is incurred on profits or otherwise, they just don't want to pay. Vetoing sales is unfair, but rational on the part of the company, so long as their recruits and employees don't understand the implications of these contracts, and therefore aren't choosing other employers on that basis. Including this constraint in the bylaws of the company rather than the Option Agreement is particular devious, and I've actually never heard of such a trick. I'm surprised it's legal. |
|