[seanseanme]

It is an interesting question, because some companies have made specialty-specific front ends to serve dermatology, for instance, but even at that resolution it ignores a lot of work flow variability between individuals.

I was thinking about the available EMRs out there right now and find that most of them are basically digital versions of the old paper medical chart (with some bells and whistles). None really try to improve upon the process of flipping between pages (or screens) to gather data or track changes , which seems like a pretty big opportunity.

[PaulHoule]

Look at the old expert systems such as MYCIN, Digitalis Advisor, etc.

These are not so much EMR systems as they are systems for structured decision making, but along the way of doing what it does, that kind of system is going to guide you through a workflow and leave structured documentation.

There is a huge literature on Business Process Management Systems that has a strong connection w/ the old expert systems because the production rules used in expert systems are very good for long-term workflows that involve both human and automated actions. Said systems are designed so the workflows are much easier for domain experts to make than it would be to create the equivalent in a conventional programming language.

Also I am thinking of an allergy&asthma practice that has four docs and a bunch of NP's, RN's and other people that has a very structured process that has a lot of paper involved but really could be automated.

Write me at [e-mail] and we can talk more.