|
|
|
|
|
by kup0
3628 days ago
|
|
What this tells me is that the only important part of the site (the content) is 20KB in size, and that the other 498KB is mostly for developer convenience? How is this a good tradeoff? A 25x increase in page size justifies what kind of benefit? For efficiency's sake in general, not to mention for a drastic reduction in data usage for mobile users or users with slow connections, I don't see why so much extra cruft is necessary. |
|