|
|
|
|
|
by auganov
3626 days ago
|
|
I don't think it's a terrible precedent. I only wish they were more uniform and systematic in banning similar kind of people. If anything it shows that you have to be very notorious until action is taken. There's plenty of accounts that incite hate without technically doing that directly in their content. For example there's this Shehab News Agency https://web.facebook.com/ShehabAgency.MainPage that will often report on terrorist attacks technically without clearly endorsing them but just by looking at the comments that praise the attacks and the overall style of reporting there's absolutely no doubt they're supportive. As the general public becomes more online-hate-speech-savvy we're bound to see more and more people adopting that strategy. |
|