Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pyrale 3627 days ago
> And anyway, there's nothing wrong with a certain amount of greediness in a capitalist system, this is what drives innovation and efficiency.

I wonder how many years will pass before people realize this mantra is an article of faith.

4 comments

The one example of innovation mentioned in Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations came from a boy who wanted to go out and play with his friends.

(His job was to activate the release valve on an early steam engine. He rigged up a string to do that so he could play. James Watt incorporated this into his design.)

(Watt and Smith were contemporaries in Edinburgh. Not only that, but Smith arranged for Watt, who'd been driven from business by the blacksmith's union (the Hammermen), to have an appointment and facilities at the University of Edinburgh. I'm fairly convinced they shared drinks at the local pub and swapped war stories.)

We're currently at 240 years, so I wouldn't hold my breath.

> It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our own necessities but of their advantages.

http://geolib.com/smith.adam/won1-02.html

Greediness is not the same as simply regarding one's interest, though the line is subjective.
The greed that people talk about when they say that greed is good (by way of Wall Street, the 1987 movie) is, though.

Also, a great many uses of the word in (lazy) criticism of markets and capitalism is that too.

> The greed that people talk about when they say that greed is good (by way of Wall Street, the 1987 movie) is, though.

Thing is, you can't reduce the pursuit of self interest to accumulating wealth. Therefore, even if we accept the definition of greed as merely pursuing wealth, we misunderstand Smith's quote and fail to acknowledge many sources of creativity. By disproportionately rewarding greed and not other work incentives, we build a society for the few that are driven by it, at the expense of most, and ultimately, we cannot thrive.

Ayn Rand's "Virtue of Selfishness" completely ignores, or fails to compare with it's vices.
It's convenient for people to believe in it because it's a self-serving belief.