Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Ntrails 3633 days ago
>Enough for what? Why not?

Let me throw out some made up numbers as an example.

Company X hires 100 people out of 500 applicants.

If only 30% of them perform well, you might argue the interview process is rubbish.

However, if you can test and show that of the "un-hired" 400 only 5% would perform well, then clearly the interview process is better than picking at random.

This is why just looking at hired performance is not indicative of whether the process works - because the task was not just to predict good performers but to predict a better rate of good performers than a random sample of applicants.