[azraomega]

While I hate companies suing people for repairing their own properties, "right" has been overused so many places. What a sensational word! I have the "right" to not being sued! What?

I would advocate companies certify other entities as repairing authorities or just do a good job themselves; providing the support. Of course it will reduce their product sale and that would be a huge deal to us consumers as well because we want them to do well and providing better product next round.

However, it is dangerous that we use sale as THE primary measure. I believe companies should take pride in the quality of their products and services. They should inspire customer loyalty, not unethical growth to please Wall Street.

[jlg23]

> While I hate companies suing people for repairing their own properties, "right" has been overused so many places.

I don't think it is outrageous to claim ownership to something that I bought. If a company does not want me to repair my own property, put a big "not for sale, only for lease" label on the package.

[azraomega]

How's it resemble "for lease"? They didn't sue people for repairing, they sued for illegally obtaining their internal documentation.

We are talking about our "right" to force other to do something rather than protecting ourselves from being forced.

It should be business issue, not an actual human right issue.

[pessimizer]

All business issues are issues of property and contract rights.