[clifanatic]

Yeah, watch out there, though. After a certain number of job changes, "too many job changes" becomes a red flag to future potential employers.

[Terretta]

Months is a problem. Two or three year stints with obvious level progression is great.

// Hiring :-)

[lloyd-christmas]

Usually that's limited to very short stints. Employers nowadays are acutely aware of the "2 year rule" (It might be my background in finance, though)

[tinbad]

In my experience it's either one of the following: a) spend (at least) 15-20 years at X company and hope to ride some waves, get lucky, to rise to the top/executive level but most likely get stuck in middle management with crappy comp b) switch every 2/3 years, probably not rise as high, but keep up with market wages and have a more diverse experience