|
|
|
|
|
by tacostakohashi
3627 days ago
|
|
The rules for 401(k) will no doubt evolve over time, within the same legal / political protections and risks as anything else. Although I wouldn't be worried about outright appropriation, it's quite possible a modest tax could be introduced, then then rise over time - who knows what could happen over 30 or 50 years. This, and the administrative overhead and inflexibility of 401(k) plans, 529 plans, health savings accounts, etc make me steer clear where practical. I use my employer's 401(k), contribute the amount needed to get the full match available, but that's it. Beyond that, I'd rather pay my income tax up-front at the going rate instead of at some mystery future rate, and keep my savings and investments as unencumbered as possible. |
|
The advantage of delaying tax payment is you have a larger upfront basis. With compound growth the initial amounts of invested capital carry _much_ more weight than later invested capital.
Just an alternative aspect to keep in mind.