[RockyMcNuts]

hmmh... I don't believe word2vec or item2vec would be considered neural network algorithms.

you come up with a model where a numerical vector represents the attributes of the word or item, you predict the likelihood of a match between words/items by multiplying vectors together, and then you use numerical optimization, i.e. an iterative gradient descent algorithm starting from randomly initialized vectors, to estimate the vectors that work best.

[ves]

They're NNs because you learn the representation using RNNs. Everything afterwards is trivial since you're in a hilbert space. But getting the representations is the hard part.

[ot]

word2vec does not use RNNs, the network is trained on a simple classification task "neighborhood" -> "word". Each word in the corpus is an independent example, there's no sequential dependence.

[eva1984]

Word2vec doesn't use RNN. It has only one softmax layer after embedding.

[RockyMcNuts]

oh, ok. Do you have to use RNNs? I think I've done them without RNNs.

Would love a good RNN word2vec type example with Tensorflow if anyone knows one.

[olh]

Or you could use a pre-trained list like the ones from Google [1]. If not you probably solved an open problem in the area and publishing it would help us not to lose time trying to solve it again.

[1] - https://code.google.com/archive/p/word2vec/

Edit: word2vec on tensorflow tutorial https://www.tensorflow.org/versions/r0.7/tutorials/word2vec/...

[RockyMcNuts]

Yeah, I implemented something based on the code from the Udacity course that Googlers (Vincent Vanhoucke) did on Tensorflow, basically same I think

their version https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/tensorf...

my version https://github.com/druce/streeteye_word2vec/blob/master/word...

[nl]

You've seen https://www.tensorflow.org/versions/r0.9/tutorials/word2vec/... ?

[rspeer]

That's standard word2vec, not an RNN.