|
|
|
|
|
by jonknee
3638 days ago
|
|
> Why didn't they mention the % of overdoses directly related to Oxy ? My assumption is that it would be significantly smaller number which didn't serve the article's purpose. Most likely because the statistics aren't available. > Moral arguments apart, they are simply not in the business of reporting their patients to law enforcement, nor they ever should. Why should they be allowed to be in business at all when their product is so destructive? |
|
I don't think it's that simple.
If you're going to start doing heroin--which you shouldn't--oxy is a much safer form than street level heroin where you have no idea what you're getting.
Phillip Seymour Hoffman ODed and died because he didn't know what he was getting. Heroin is actually pretty safe, but it destroys your soul and you never really "cure" the addiction. Even still, I'd rather have oxy out there than tar heroin from Mexican drug cartels. And I'd rather spend government resources on something else.