|
|
|
|
|
by spb
3637 days ago
|
|
There's way more to VR than the fact that presentation is stereoscopic. Writing off VR on the basis that 3D has been over-hyped before is like writing off the Macintosh for not being the first device capable of raster presentation. You might want to check out this thread to get some idea: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12046398 |
|
People also thought stereoscopic photos were the "new medium going forward", so linking to somebody amazed about a novel experience doesn't change my mind. It's another example of exactly how I think people shouldn't make this decision.
What will make the difference for me is not yet another person being amazed, but people using VR gear on a daily basis for something after the novelty wears off. At this point I have asked an awful lot of VR partisans for examples of that sort of usage, but so far nobody has offered anything substantial.
I hope one day it will get there, but until it does, I personally wouldn't bet much on it.