[shostack]

Interesting research and thanks for the link.

So it looks like we're in agreement that this primarily would apply to the upper levels of ibanking when there is an expectation of deal sourcing. But for junior analysts and such, there really isn't that stigma since their performance is not measured on a sales basis (and thus their mobility is not necessarily hindered by a down year).

Do you have any info or insights into how deal sourcing typically works at that level? Seems like a crazy thing to measure against when your annual deal volume would be relatively low given the size of the deals.

[morgante]

> So it looks like we're in agreement that this primarily would apply to the upper levels of ibanking when there is an expectation of deal sourcing.

I've never worked in finance, but I have a lot of friends who do.

From the day they entered (ie. as junior analysts), up or out has been the mantra. You simply cannot be in a position for more than a few years. If you're not promoted to the next level, you're fired (though most of them had the sense to switch industries when it became clear they weren't going to be promoted).

Deal sourcing comes in at higher levels, but the "tournament" structure is embedded throughout.

[shostack]

Where do a lot of them tend to end up if they jump ship, and where to they tend to end up if they don't have the foresight to jump ship and are fired?

[morgante]

Every other industry. (Including and especially tech.)

A good portion of the business people you meet outside of finance are people who wanted to work in finance but couldn't hack it.

[infinite8s]

Or as michaelochurch likes to say, SV's CEOs are NYC's rejects. Not that I agree with him.