|
|
|
|
|
|
by richman777
3644 days ago
|
|
|
I have to agree with you. The OP said they clearly violated the notification statute for banking record. Except that statute clearly states a subpoena issued by a valid agency (here a lawyer involved in a case) was a valid reason. They presented just as poor of an argument against the article as they claim the article itself did. |
|
|