|
|
|
|
|
|
by alixaxel
3638 days ago
|
|
|
Certainly a lot of FUD on my part - nothing wrong with that, that how scientific progress should be validated IMO). "The bizarre reports come only six months after Elsevier created a special new position, Associate Editor for Biotechnology (i.e. GMO), and filled it with a former Monsanto employee who worked for the giant Monsanto front-organization, the International Life Sciences Institute, which develops industry-friendly risk assessment methods for GM foods and chemical food contaminants and inserts them into government regulations. Sound like something wrong with this picture?" https://www.rt.com/op-edge/monsanto-gmo-studies-reports-588/ |
|
|