|
|
|
|
|
by yummyfajitas
3644 days ago
|
|
* You perform business in a country? Pay the taxes for all revenue factually originating in that country, not technically based on loopholes. If revenue originates from a customer/client/subsidiary in country X, you pay taxes in country X; you don't get to have customers in country X, but pretend like your business in country Y really took their money. Simple as that.* You seem to be wanting a consumption tax rather than an income tax. This is known by economists to be the least distortionary tax, for the exact reason you argue. It's also highly criticized by left wing types since it taxes people in proportion to the benefit they receive from society rather than what they produce for society. Typically poor people consume more than they produce, while rich people produce more than they consume. Large companies that threaten to abandon doing business because state X or country X makes them pay tax? Farewell, we don't need you. Except that very often, we do. Just look at Austin - as a result of their little feud with Uber/Lyft, they are now providing below sub-developing world level services. |
|