Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by shritesh 3646 days ago
This Twitter analysis on the FAQ is worth following: https://twitter.com/pwnallthethings/status/74848214296815616...
3 comments

All guessing of course, but disagree with the insinuation it points to Russians still.

- Rambo is not just a lame attempt at sprinkling in an American cultural reference. It is exactly what an Easter European boy in his 30s would have been looking up to back in the day.

- Other than just Russian security services can find translators. English speaking / translating ability is not a rare, expert-only domain. Could have asked a friend.

I guess at the end of the day, nobody likes to be hacked by a random loner guy. It feels more validating to be targeted by KGB's successor. As it explains away the security failures -- "Well these people torture and kill, should be glad we only got hacked by them, could have been a lot worse ...".

This guy is saying some really ridiculous things

For example: https://twitter.com/pwnallthethings/status/74852434881898905... No, not every fixed security issue gets a CVE. Not even 1% of them. This is why while auditing a target you'll try to get a copy of the software version they run, and any newer versions to identify patched bugs.

https://twitter.com/pwnallthethings/status/74852495484558131... There's really no inconsistency here, "non-public" generally means "not very well audited"

Why is it that .ru intelligence is even pegged as a likely candidate here? Literally nothing pointing towards them, you don't have to be an intelligence agency to pop some DNC boxes.

That's mostly conjecture. No facts, just observations that might be true or not.